Few events in American history have generated as much debate as the Great Depression. Both historians and economists have disagreed about its exact causes with both sides offering explanations that range from stock market speculation and banking failures to government mistakes and structural weaknesses in the American economy. As Michael Bernstein observes, there remains no single consensus regarding why the Depression became so severe or why recovery took so long. [1] While several economic theories offer valuable insights, Keynesian economics provides the most convincing explanation for both the persistence of the Depression and its eventual demise. Although Austrian economists emphasize excessive credit expansion and speculation during the 1920s, additional evidence suggests that the collapse of consumer demand and the government’s efforts to restore spending played a centra role in both the crisis and the recovery that followed.
The stock market crash of October 1929 is often remembered as the beginning of the Great Depression, but the crisis expanded well beyond Wall Street. Businesses reduced production, banks failed and unemployment rose dramatically. As more Americans lost their jobs, consumer spending declined which created a cycle in which falling demand led to additional layoffs and business failures. Keynesian economics argues that this collapse in aggregate demand is what transformed a severe recession into a prolonged economic catastrophe. Rather than correcting itself, the economy became trapped in a downward spiral as consumers and businesses simultaneously reduced spending.
However, not everyone agrees with this interpretation. Austrian economists, represented by Fred Foldvary’s discussion of Austrian Business Cycle Theory, argue that economic crises often originate in periods of artificially low interest rates and excessive credit expansion. According to Foldvary, easy credit encourages investments that appear profitable in the short term but ultimately prove unsustainable. When these speculative investments fail, recession follows.[2] This perspective offers a useful explanation for the speculative environment of the 1920s, especially the rapid growth of stock market investment and borrowing. In many ways, the Austrian theory helps to explain why the economy became vulnerable to collapse in the first place.
Although Austrian theory helps explain the origins of the downturn, it does not sully explain why unemployment remained persistently high throughout the 1930s. Keynesian theory provides a stronger explanation for this prolonged suffering because it focuses on what happened after the crash. As consumer confidence disappeared and spending declined, businesses had little incentive to give workers or expand production. The economy needed a source of renewed demand and private markets alone were unable to provide it.
Franklin D. Roosevelt recognized this challenge almost immediately after taking office in 1933. In his first Inaugural Address, Roosevelt attempted to restore public confidence while signaling a more active role for the federal government. His famous declaration that “the only thing we have to fear itself…” reflected the widespread uncertainty that had spread throughout the nation.[3] Roosevelt understood that economic recovery required more than balancing budgets or waiting for the market to naturally recover. Americans needed confidence in their banks, in their government and in the future.
This effort continued through Roosevelt’s Fireside Chats, particularly his first radio address concerning the banking crisis. Speaking directly to Americans, Roosevelt explained the temporary bank holiday and reassured citizens that the banking system was stabilizing. By encouraging Americans to redeposit their savings, Roosevelt sought to restore trust in financial institutions and restart economic activity.[4] These efforts aligned closely with Keynesian ideas about the importance of confidence and spending in economic recovery.
The New Deal further reflected many principles associated with Keynesian economics. Programs such as the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) and the Works Progress Administration (WPA) provided employment opportunities for millions of Americans. Thesis initiatives did more than create jobs. Workers spent their wages on food, clothing and other necessities which supported local businesses and generated additional economic activity. Keynes described this process as the multiplier effect in which one person’s spending becomes another’s income.[5] While the New Deal did not fully end the Depression, it helped to stabilize the economy and reduce some of the worst hardships experiences by American families.
The strongest evidence supporting Keynesian interpretation emerged during World War II when government spending increased dramatically. As the United States mobilized for war, factories expended production, unemployment fell and millions of Americans joined the workforce. The federal government became the largest purchaser of goods and services in the nation, creating precisely the kind of demand that Keynes believed was necessary during periods of economic stagnation. While historians continue to debate whether the New Deal alone ended the Depression, there is little doubt that wartime spending accelerated recovery and restored full employment.
One of the most interesting aspects of the Great Depression is that scholars still debate its causes nearly a century later. Bernstein’s historiographical overview demonstrates that explanation range from financial collapse and policy failures to deeper structural weaknesses within the economy.[6] Austrian economists such as Foldvary emphasize the dangers of speculation and credit expansion while Keynesian economists focus on the collapse of demand and the necessity of government intervention. Both perspectives certainly offer valuable insights, but Keynesian economics ultimately provides the most convincing explanation for why the Depression lasted so long and why recovery occurred when it did. The experiences of the New Deal and World War II suggest that restoring demand through government action played a crucial role in helping the United States emerge from its greatest economic crisis.
Bibliography
Bernstein, Michael A. “The Great Depression as Historical Problem.” OAH Magazine of History 16, no. 1 (2001): 3–10.
Foldvary, Fred E. “The Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle.” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 74, no. 2 (2015): 278–297.
Keynes, John Maynard. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillan, 1936.
Roosevelt, Franklin D. “First Inaugural Address.” March 4, 1933. In The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Vol. 2. New York: Random House, 1938.
Roosevelt, Franklin D. “On the Banking Crisis.” Fireside Chat, March 12, 1933. In The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Vol. 2. New York: Random House, 1938.
[1] Michael A. Bernstein, “The Great Depression as Historical Problem,” OAH Magazine of History 16, no. 1 (2001): 3.
[2] Fred E. Foldvary, “The Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle,” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 74, no. 2 (2015): 278–279.
[3] Franklin D. Roosevelt, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1933.
[4] Franklin D. Roosevelt, “On the Banking Crisis,” Fireside Chat, March 12, 1933.
[5] John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (London: Macmillan, 1936), 15.
[6] Bernstein, “The Great Depression as Historical Problem,” 3–5.
Margins of History 
Leave a comment